Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by matilda on May 15, 2019, 11:47:40 AM »
@clk11
> if it would be possible to share the software or utility that was used to create camera profiles?
> Maybe the community can contribute with creating additional camera support profiles

Unfortunately it is not possible to share the profile creation software, but we are trying to change the profiling procedure so that the profile creation will be mostly automatic, so the new profiles will be created by the users anyway.

That would be absolute genius, taking the burden off of photoacute.  You could setup a forum to share profiles....

I'd buy it all over again if that worked out.

Recently sold a legacy camera, and no longer have a profile for my modern gear.. even with a D850, I do miss superresolution for some things (e.g., landscape, some macro).

2
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by KenO on April 12, 2019, 09:46:21 AM »
Hi Eugene,

After a long absence, tested the trial version of PhotoAcute 3.016 and am still impressed with it.

Would be glad to be a Beta Tester when you release a new version.

Have been reading all the previous comments and would also like to request a registration key.

Thanks

Ken
3
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by Eugene (PhotoAcute) on March 08, 2019, 05:10:46 AM »
@clk11
> if it would be possible to share the software or utility that was used to create camera profiles?
> Maybe the community can contribute with creating additional camera support profiles

Unfortunately it is not possible to share the profile creation software, but we are trying to change the profiling procedure so that the profile creation will be mostly automatic, so the new profiles will be created by the users anyway.

4
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by megapixel on March 02, 2019, 12:03:54 PM »
Could you send me a license for 3.016 version please?
Thank you
5
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by YuhChing on February 23, 2019, 06:15:19 AM »
Dear Eugene ,
I am new to PhotoAcute. And I would like to pay for the validation code. Please PM for your account. And we could chat further with collaboration is possible.
6
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by manupalo on February 05, 2019, 05:24:47 AM »
Hi Eugène, I Have proved the version trial of photoacure and me great taste since it works. How it is possible to register it to obtain the code?

Thanks
7
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by Pruutus on February 05, 2019, 02:11:46 AM »
I too would like some way to get a registration key if possible.
8
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by clk11 on February 04, 2019, 07:03:32 PM »
Hi Eugene, wondering if it would be possible to share the software or utility that was used to create camera profiles?

Maybe the community can contribute with creating additional camera support profiles - It seems that with RAW files from some of the newer camera bodies (40-50MP), about 1/3 of the resulting processed image is garbled. Not sure if this is a result of the camera profile or a limitation in the existing software, but I am sure many of us would be happy to put in the work and share profiles for newer cameras/lenses if that is possible?
9
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by bobjase on February 04, 2019, 04:43:59 PM »
Is there any way to still get a license for the newest version?
10
Discussion / Re: PhotoAcute still supported?
« Last post by TOPAZ on January 30, 2019, 02:41:13 PM »
I have a question that has been may be already answered :

is there a far better improvement in superresolution if the camera has micro movements between shots ?
I guess it's YES but as I use AP with a scanner, moving the negatives that have been fluid mounted is not easy...

Topaz


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10